🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are watching closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring similar measures.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban could be "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged parliament to pass a law raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to block their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a useful foundation," stated the parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, interest built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization established by the family of a girl who took her own life after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the regional level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra use dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws requiring guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional states are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies strike a more cautious tone. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "could backfire". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this international conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that governments around the world are no longer willing to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.